Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
UCLA ~ The latest on UCLA, by the Orange County Register Sports staff

UCLA football: 10 things we learned in spring (No. 10)

May 13th, 2009, 7:00 am · 5 Comments · posted by Adam Maya, staff writer since 2006

Finally … here’s the tenth of 10 things we learned this spring about UCLA football:

10. UCLA is still a year away.

Let’s get this out of the way first: No way will the Bruins be worse than they were in 2008. Even the most conservative examination shows they are better at every defensive position as well as the skill positions.

Of course, the two biggest concerns are at quarterback and on the offensive line. While Kevin Prince and his pawns were UCLA’s biggest problem for the better part of three scrimmages, there is a vast difference between them and what UCLA put on the field at the same position a year ago. It’s called talent.

Prince is stronger, smarter, more accurate, more confident and a better decision-maker than last year’s starter (and this year’s possible No. 2) Kevin Craft. Sure, Prince stumbled in game-like situations that were only a fraction of what he’ll face come fall.

But let’s put that into context: Part of what made Prince look bad was how quickly he managed to raise the level of expectations at the quarterback position. It took him all of four practices to establish himself as the Bruins’ likely starter.

His presence under center will allow offensive coordinator Norm Chow to stop calling plays out of fear and resignation. Just consider how Craft, who fared much worse than Prince in spring, wasn’t allowed anywhere near the first team except for the one day Prince rested a sore shoulder.

Prince is certainly an upgrade, maybe even a big one.

On the line, the Bruins are three-fifths of the way toward having a legitimate starting lineup. Center Kai Maiava, tackle Sean Sheller, and Jeff Baca, who can play all three positions, are good enough to start at other schools.

The Bruins’ problem is they don’t have two other players good enough to start at their school. True freshmen and JC transfers will probably have to do for now, and even they should signal an improvement given their four-star profiles.

It all makes for a respectable UCLA team. I’ve heard some writers who regularly cover the team say it might win eight games. Uh, no. Not after the spring game made clear the defense will again be counted on to keep UCLA in most games and perhaps win a few.

The Bruins, as any one of their coaches will tell you, severely lack depth, much less the talent needed to win two-thirds of their games. That’s without even looking at the schedule. In fact, there’s only seven games UCLA can win — San Diego State, Kansas State, at Stanford, at Arizona, Washington, at Washington State, Arizona State.

Last year, UCLA’s best/worst-case scenario ranged from 4-8 to 6-6. This year it’s slightly better: 5-7 to 7-5. I say they finish .500 and earn a bowl bid.

10 THINGS WE LEARNED SCHEDULE

More from the UCLA blog:

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • TwitThis
ADVERTISEMENT

 5 Comments

  • Ryan says:

    Has anyone else heard about donovan carter and milton Knox transfering? Is this legitimate news?

  • aj says:

    what makes prince who hasn’t started a game in 3 years better than craft who was juco player of the year in ‘07. reporters were saying the same things bout craft this time last year. strong arm, takes care of the ball. i dont mean to sound condescending, but c’mon…if / when prince struggles, i expect chow to shrink the playbook once again, dont you?

  • Reese says:

    A year away from what? They can’t recruit against any good program. And a deploma from UCLA is only good for TP. Anyone catch the spelling error? Amazing!

  • Josh says:

    UCLA’s has 2 top 25 recruiting classes in a row, one them arguably in the top 10. USC’s recruiting is going to take a big hit from the latest scandals almost no matter how it pans out. Guess where the local recruits will look to instead. I’d think we can already bank on another highly ranked recruiting class next year. 2 Four star linemen incoming and 2 out of the other 3 best linemen have got 2-3 years left. A year away is about right. I’m estimating 7 wins this year and 10 next.

    UCLA’s defense is scary. If Paclic can get something working on the O-line UCLA will be dangerous. Don’t forget what we saw in the spring game. Our top receiver, our top offensive lineman, our two top TE’s were all out hurt. That is why you saw a broken offense. We have only seen one of the incoming JC transfer O-linemen. Haskiak and Sua’filo are good enough to start now. With Maivia(sp?) back that gives us almost a whole new O-line.

    While I don’t think that O-line will be clicking on day one, by mid season, they should be almost adequate.

    P.S. Adam, why don’t you think Tennessee is a “can win”? We edged them out last season and this year we added more talent than they did, not to mention the fact that we are either more talented or more experienced at every single position with exception of the other defensive tackle spot, compared to last year? Granted, its an away game, but I think our upgrades make up for it. I predict our defense shuts them down and we punt and kick our way to victory.

  • pkcourt says:

    Wow I am so impressed of the mighty ucla fb program I see them going 12-0 and winning the D-2 championship.

Leave a Reply